Is It the Right Time for Impeachment?

After months of deliberation and hand-wringing, Nancy Pelosi has announced that the Democrats are moving forward with an impeachment inquiry regarding the president’s latest scandal. During the Mueller investigation, Pelosi insisted that the time wasn’t right for impeachment. What changed her mind?

By stepping up and seriously pursuing impeachment, House Democrats can salvage their legacy and meet their obligation to defend the Constitution against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Democrats can’t be confident that seeking to remove Trump from office will help them, or that it will hurt them. Hence the indecision that they have only just resolved. With the politics hard to figure, they may as well do what they think is right.

Rejecting the accumulated wisdom of a long and successful career in the House of Representatives, she set aside her own instincts and announced the beginning of formal impeachment proceedings against President Trump on the basis of a third-hand rumor about a phone call with the president of a Eurasian republic… She knows that it will be a disaster for the Democratic Party, that it will inflame the president’s base and inspire even his most lukewarm supporters with a sense of outrage.

Will the Ukraine Scandal Hurt Biden?

Trump may be in big trouble for potentially goading Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden’s son’s business dealings abroad—but what about Biden himself? Is there anything to Trump’s insinuations of corruption? Will the scandal come to hurt Biden’s 2020 bid? More at NBC.

Biden is a fragile front-runner and the whole matter involving his son’s foreign business dealings not only raises unflattering questions but provides plenty of reminders about his life in the swamp. Trump, on the other hand, is exceptionally durable with his base, to say nothing of the fact that his entire presidency has practically been defined by his ability to outlive Democratic “witch hunts.”

Whether or not Hunter Biden broke any laws his business arrangements in Ukraine were overtly sleazy.

This is an unavoidable truth, especially when they are taken in context as part of a pattern of odd and lucrative foreign business dealings. This includes a bank deal in China that his father Joe Biden, the former vice president, directly enabled by ferrying his son on Air Force Two on an official diplomatic trip to the Orient.

Trump evidently sees the conspiracy theory as a way to turn the whistleblower’s complaint into electoral gain — perhaps in hopes of saddling the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination with a Benghazi-like scandal that just won’t go away.

Can President Rivlin Save Israel’s Democracy?

After a close election, Israeli President Reuven Rivlin has been pushing for a unity government between Netanyahu and Gantz. His goal is to avoid a third round of elections. But is his agenda saving Israel’s democracy or getting in the way? More at Times of Israel.

The power held by President Reuven Rivlin stems not only from the law that grants him discretion to choose the candidate he thinks is able to create a coalition, but also from his right to tell the public who is to blame for the failure to do so. The party blamed for forcing a third election on the Israeli public will emerge weaker, while its opponent is more likely to head the next government.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is finished.

Rivlin is known for his great respect for democracy, and will surely do what he believes is right to reflect the will of the people… Respected as Rivlin may be, the decision should not be his alone. The law does not give Rivlin guidance on what to do in this situation, and the decision will surely weigh heavily on him.

It isn’t clear by what rights Rivlin took it upon himself to extend the boundaries of presidential discretion and implore the sides to renege on their promises to their voters. Rivlin is both mistaken and misleading when he describes not wanting to join a government with Netanyahu as a boycott. Kahol Lavan was established for the purpose of offering an alternative to Netanyahu and his corrupt and corrupting government.

Who’s To Blame for California’s Homelessness Crisis?

President Trump wants to address California’s housing and homelessness problem. But while Trump wants to blame Californians for the crisis, Californians think Trump should look at his own policies first. More at CityLab.

Democrats blame rising rents for driving people onto the streets. But as a new White House Council of Economic Advisers white paper on homelessness notes, housing costs are swelled by restrictive building codes, zoning, environmental mandates, rent control, cumbersome permitting and labor regulations—in other words, liberal policies.

Though we face a particularly acute crisis in Los Angeles, on the national level, in state after state similar trends persist as well. Despite an economy that is booming and unemployment at its lowest point in decades, cuts by the federal government to affordable housing programs and mental health facilities in the last few decades helped send many to the streets.

There are as many reasons for homelessness as there are people sleeping on sidewalks. And that means we need a wide range of approaches to solving the problem, aimed at addressing the needs of individuals. We simply can’t force all homeless people into a relatively narrow set of solutions.

Is It OK to Have Kids During a Climate Crisis?

A young girl named Emma Lim has started a website where people can sign a pledge to abstain from having children until the government takes more significant action to battle climate change. It’s true that not having children lowers one’s climate footprint. It also may be true that one’s children will have to live through a worsening climate crisis. But does that mean it’s necessarily wrong to start a family under these conditions? More at USA Today.

I am giving up my chance of having a family because I will only have children if I know I can keep them safe. It breaks my heart, but I created this pledge because I know I am not alone. I am not the only young person giving up lifelong dreams because they are unsure of what the future will hold. We’ve read the science, and now we’re pleading with our government.

…life is neither a gift one gives nor a duty one burdens another with. This is why we have no more reason to fear that our kids will demand an explanation for why we brought them into the world than we are in the habit of demanding such justification from our parents. The question they will be justified in asking us is not why we gave them life, but why we didn’t do more to care for the only world they have to live in—which is to say, why we didn’t lead a better life ourselves.

Seeing reduced reproduction as a solution is unlikely to target those who most need to change. It’s likely to unfairly target the already disadvantaged.

Moreover, those whose kids are least likely to be affected by climate change are often likely to be the largest emitters, meaning again, we’re punishing the innocent — twice.

Can a Tech Shabbat Help You Thrive?

As technology becomes a more inescapable part of our daily lives, people are looking to the ancient practice of Shabbat as a remedy. Both Arianna Huffington’s Thrive Global initiative and Tiffany Shlain’s Character Day are exploring a “tech Shabbat” as a way to restore some peace to our distracted, modern souls.

Thousands of years ago, when the ancient Hebrews began observing Shabbat, it changed the world. Now, with the digital revolution at hand, it’s time to change it again. “Tech Shabbat” offers a path, giving us a weekly break and making us more mindful of our use the other six days. I hope you’ll join me this Sept. 27 and see for yourself.

Try planning ahead for a Tech Shabbat this coming weekend, along with millions of people who are participating for Character Day. Get as many people in your family to join as you can. Print out anything you think you’ll need in advance. And if, like me, you need motivation to get started, ask the people you love whether taking break from devices would improve your quality of life — or theirs.

If you think you’re too busy to take off one full day a week, it may help to know that research suggests working fewer hours can actually increase productivity. A 2014 study from Stanford showed that productivity actually decreases when you work over 50 hours per week. Companies that offer 32-hour workweeks, or six-hour workdays, report both increased productivity and employee satisfaction.

Roundtable Extra: “We Stand Divided” by Daniel Gordis

From National Jewish Book Award Winner and author of Israel, a bold reevaluation of the tensions between American and Israeli Jews that reimagines the past, present, and future of Jewish life. Enjoy this excerpt of “We Stand Divided: The Rift Between American Jews and Israel,” by Daniel Gordis:

“The prevailing view… is that the root cause of the rift between American Jews and Israel is what Israel does: if Israel only behaved better, the relationship could be healed. There is only one problem with that explanation: it is wrong.

Why is the conventional wisdom mistaken? Let’s return to our marriage metaphor. When a couple quarrels over dishes left in the sink or socks dropped on the floor, the problem is rarely about kitchens or bedroom floors. The issues in the dynamic are generally much deeper, more profound and far-reaching, than the immediate issues that triggered the quarrel. The same is true with Israel and American Jews. That is not to say that Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians is not a critically important security, demographic, and moral challenge, the resolution of which may ultimately determine whether Israel can remain both Jewish and democratic. It absolutely is. In particular, millions of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation—even if it is an occupation that Israel did not seek and has tried to end—is terrible for the Palestinians and a threat to Israel’s moral and democratic core.

Nor is the suggestion that something deeper than the immediate triggers is at play meant to suggest that the Israeli rabbinate’s views of non-Orthodox Jews are not gratuitously offensive and callously dismissive of those with whom they disagree. Or that Israel’s handling of an African asylum issue is not key to the kind of country Israel will or should become. All of those are profound issues that everyone who cares about the Jewish state needs to take very seriously.

The proof that these explanations are insufficient lies in the fact that the fraught relations between American Jews and Israel predate by decades the conflict with Arabs and then the Palestinians; the tensions arose long before the ugliness of Israel’s treatment of non-Orthodox Jews. The real issue that divides the world’s two largest Jewish communities, as we have noted, is not what Israel does, but what Israel is. The essential issue, we will suggest, is that, at their core, America and Israel are exceedingly different: created for different purposes, they believe in and foster very different sorts of societies with very different values and different visions of Judaism.

For decades, American Jews have assumed that the more Israel emulates the United States the more admirable it will be. The more Israel acts in ways that highlight the differences between its values and those of the United States, however, the more difficult it becomes for American Jews to support it.

Yet American Jews misunderstand Israel when they assume that Israel’s founders wanted or expected it to mirror America’s core values. And Israeli Jews often wrongly read American Jews’ differences as disloyalty, or laziness, without appreciating that American Judaism has a profound, but very different, set of core values. Israel’s founders never hoped that Israel would be an imitation of America, and American Jewish leaders recognized from the outset that a Jewish state would threaten some of their deepest commitments. The divisions between American Jews and the Zionist project have always run deep, in large measure because the values and priorities of Zionism are diametrically opposed to many of the values that have made America the extraordinary country it is.

The United States and Israel were created for entirely different purposes, and as a result, they are fundamentally different experiments in how to enable humans to flourish. In the chapters that follow, we will look at several of the key commitments that make Israel and America so different.

To uncover the origins of today’s fraught relations between American Jews and Israel, we need to begin with the very origins of Zionism itself.”

Today’s Hot Issues

Is It the Right Time for Impeachment? Will the Ukraine Scandal Hurt Biden? Can President Rivlin Save Israel’s Democracy? Who’s To Blame for California’s Homelessness Crisis? Is It OK to Have Kids During a Climate Crisis? Can a Tech Shabbat Help You Thrive? Roundtable Extra: “We Stand Divided” by Daniel Gordis